Unfortunately Addison Brown passed away Januray 2000. Please addres all inquiries to akwu@canuck.com or miracle@iname.com

75. WHAT IS LIFE BUYING?

Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 22:22:03 -0800 R46.96
From: Tom Seaman
To: aab@teleport.com
Subject: your web page aab,

I had difficulty understanding your web page. it looks like you put a lot of thought into it. Could you please sum it up in two or three very clean sentences. I think I get the gist of the title, but even that is a little vague (what is "life buying").

REPLY: Revised Introduction page according to your suggestion. 47SEAM.96

Date: Sun, 07 Apr 1996 21:10:38 -0700 R47c.96
From: Tom Seaman
To: Addison Brown

Ref: "Revised Introduction per your suggestion". Sorry, I don't see where you've changed anything. Are you sure you uploaded your modified pages? perhaps you could simply respond to my question with email instead of asking me search your site once more. >

From: aab@teleport.com http://www.teleport.com/~aab 47SEAM.96
To: tseaman@teleport.com

Below is the revised wording of "Introduction" from my "Contents" page. This is a poor way to present this because it is not possible in an email message to have text go to underlined HTML links for additional clarification where additional explanation appears to be necessary.

Are you accessing my home page by typing URL http://www.teleport.com/~aab, or are you accessing it through an HTML link from someone else's home page or a summary in a search program that comments on some selection from the "Contents" page other than the first entry, "Introduction"?

I have had a running disagreement with various individuals for over a year about "human understood reincarnation" NOT being a significant or useful test of Resonation Physics at this time (available necessary records kept in such a sloppy way as to be all but useless, thus it is a concept suggestion for some time in the future when the necessary care is used in the required records keeping). It seems to be ignored by almost everyone that I say the main useful test and application at this time is to seeing if Resonation Physics can show ways to "end or avert destruction" in human business procedure.

A person spends a few minutes of one's life being born and dying. In between birth and death are 70 to 80 years of various problems of "deterioration or destruction" to engage in continually solving, and among the most often encountered conditions of destruction are those resulting from as yet unsolved problems in current human business procedure. (See list of solved problems at the start of the Introduction page). Thus I suggest those 80 years or so are a more useful area to test a cosmology at this time, than the area of the few minutes when one is born and dies. See the "Why only reincarnation" selection in "Answers to questions" on the "Contents" page.

Some search programs and summaries of what I suggest leave the impression that the only area where I make suggestions is about "human understood reincarnation". Resonation Physics to replace force overpowering force physics is not even mentioned. Neither is any hint given that its principal area of practical application and test is with destruction resulting from the way current human business procedure is conducted, and not with the seeming "destruction" that is death..

Here it is the revision in the "Introduction" as you requested.

----------

Will each person who reads anything at this http://www address please return a comment pro or con about any of the ideas and procedures described, or acknowledgement that something on this home page was read and perhaps why you stopped reading, --- to aab@teleport.com

BRIEF SUMMARY

Suppose we think of keeping business records in the following way: ---

We keep a record of the total value each person puts into life.

You can receive for personal use (reward in life for helping others) before anyone who has put a smaller total value into life, but after anyone who has put a larger total value into life.

Instead of trying to take away from someone a value "equal to" what one receives out, to "pay for what is received out", anyone is "paid" for what one puts in, by their "total value put into life recognition" being increased as a BOOKKEEPING ENTRY by the value of what one put in.

Nothing is taken away from someone in order to receive something out of life.

A 12 WORD, "I HAVE TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THAT" SOUND BITE"

To try to get people thinking about and talking about this different way to think of current business records that can solve most of the problems of current business systems, the following is a 12 word "sound bite" that quickly describes this suggestion: ---

The 12 words

"TOTAL VALUE PUT INTO LIFE BUYING,
PAY BY THE ACT OF DISTRIBUTION"

combined with the title "THE FINANCIAL MIRACLE THAT CAN SOLVE CURRENT PROBLEMS"

--- is an effort to make a very brief statement (for those who say all of this home page has too many words and hard to understand sentences), that is so compelling and simple, that anyone who hears or sees the 12 words will feel compelled to repeat them to someone else and ask what they think of them or what is some of the rest of that 12 word tip of an iceberg.

Buying based on the total value you have put into life

Pay, profit, wages, reward for putting value into life by the act of distribution,

as a bookkeeping entry instead of trying to take away from a customer or employer a value "equal to" what a customer receives or the value an employee puts into an employer's business. See 5 description in a few more words.

The reply to "duhh - what was that?" is: ---

--- using Mosaic or Netscape on the Internet www, at URL or Location, type http://www.teleport.com/~aab

--------------

Main rewording for clarification is the line "Buying based on the total value you have put into life", to clarify what you pointed out as "...life buying" in "total value put into life buying" being ambiguous. What is "life buying?" One should read the whole 6 word sentence as one sentence, instead of acting as if "life buying" is a separate idea not requiring the 4 words that precede it to be understandable. Several other lines removed for more brevity on this brief summary page.

The rest of the attempts at "summary in two or three very clean sentences" on the Introduction are unchanged. I don't see how I can write them in fewer words and still say what they are endeaovring to say. Are you sure you are looking at the first screen that comes up when you type URL http://www.teleport.com/~aab, or are you looking at some other screen that comes up from an HTML link from someone else's program or comment in a search program on something other that my Introduction page?

Thank you for following up on your comment.

END aab@teleport.com 47SEAM.96

Additional wording revision June 19, 1996

Go to 76 Another approach to conquering death

Go back to Contents